|
Hand Evaluation
Part VIII
by Brian Senior
Responder Makes a Game Try
It is not always opener who
has to decide whether to make a game try. In an auction such as
1 -
1
- 2 ,
it is responder's suit which has been agreed and accordingly it
is her decision whether to make a move. It is not quite so easy
to lay down hard and fast rules in this situation as it was after
responder had raised opener's suit to the two level.
Although we know that opener's simple raise is consistent with a
near-minimum hand, that still covers a much wider range of handtypes
than in the previous situation. It is worth bearing in mind that
our basic bidding methods will have an effect on partner's likely
handtype and therefore on the odds of game being on. Say that we
play Acol, or a similar four card major system, with
a weak no trump.
Now the sequence 1
- 1
- 2
is entirely consistent with all these examples:
| (i) |
 |
K 5 3 |
| |
 |
Q 8 6 4 |
| |
 |
8 |
| |
 |
A Q 10 8 6 |
| (ii) |
 |
8 |
| |
 |
K 5 3 |
| |
 |
Q 8 6 4 |
| |
 |
A Q 10 8 6 |
| (iii) |
 |
K 5 3 |
| |
 |
J 8 6 4 |
| |
 |
A 2 |
| |
 |
A Q J 7 |
Opener will always have extra
values in some form or another, either in high cards (iii) or in
distribution (i) and (ii), but there is no guarantee of four card
support. Examples (i) and (ii) are also entirely consistent with
a strong no trump based system, whether playing four or five
card majors. If we have to open one of a minor when holding a minimum
balanced opening then even this is a possible hand for our auction:
| (iv) |
 |
K
Q 6 |
| |
 |
J 10 7 3 |
| |
 |
K 9 4 |
| |
 |
K 10 9 |
Now you might say that you would
not open that specific example due to its sterile shape and lack
of aces, but the majority of players would.
Anyway, you take my point, that in this type of system the 2
rebid may have extra values in terms of distribution but not in
high cards and may be a very unattractive balanced minimum.
Clearly, if opener's average hand
is significantly weaker in the second style, then responder
needs to be that shade better before trying for game. So there will
be some hands which will move over 2
in a weak no trump structure but not in a strong no
trump structure.
This should be considered any time that we think we have a borderline
decision. When selecting our game try, we should again bear in mind
that partner may have supported us with only three trumps and that
at some point, we may want to clarify whether there is an eight
card fit. While a 2NT game try, or going back to partner's first
suit, might be based on either four or five cards in our own suit,
it simplifies things if a bid in a new suit promises five cards
in the agreed trump suit.
Forrester, who is assuming an Acol weak no trump base,
suggests a 'Rule of Nineteen'. Responder adds his high card
points to the number of cards held in his two longest suits. If
the total comes to nineteen or more the hand should at least try
for game, if it does not then we should settle for a partscore.
Of course, while this is a good basis on which to work, a certain
amount of judgement is also required.
| (v) |
 |
Q
8 3 |
| |
 |
A 10 7 6 4 |
| |
 |
Q 9 7 |
| |
 |
K 4 |
Bid 2NT. Though we have at least
eight trumps and a useful fitting club card, at least one of the
queens will be of dubious value opposite an unbalanced hand
so to bid game is too much. 2NT tells partner to look at her whole
hand, not concentrate on one particular suit.
| (vi) |
 |
10
3 |
| |
 |
A J 10 8 6 |
| |
 |
Q 8 6 4 |
| |
 |
K 2 |
Bid 3 .
Nine cards in two suits plus 10 HCP qualifies under the Forrester
rule and the K
is a particularly good card. As partner's diamond holding may be
crucial, 3
is the best game try. Note that the strong no trumpers do not have
the extra comfort of knowing that the K
is well-placed, making things a little vaguer. It will be opposite
an unbalanced hand but not necessarily if partner has a weak no
trump type.
| (vii) |
 |
K
J |
| |
 |
Q 7 6 3 2 |
| |
 |
Q 5 3 2 |
| |
 |
Q 8 |
This hand also qualifies, but both
suits are weak, we have no intermediates, and there
are poor honours in the short suits. Game may be on but we
are more likely to end up in 3
or 4
going down if we make a try.
| (viii) |
 |
A Q 4 3 |
| |
 |
Q 9 8 7 6 3 |
| |
 |
10 |
| |
 |
5 4 |
Bid 2 .
The count only comes to eighteen but the big trump fit makes
it far too easy for game to be on for us to feel comfortable passing.
Change the Q
to the king and we should bid 4 .
Making a game try when we need so little help puts too much strain
on partner's judgement.
| (ix) |
 |
A 6 |
| |
 |
K J 9 7 5 |
| |
 |
10 4 |
| |
 |
Q 8 7 6 |
Bid 3 .
The fact that clubs was partner's first suit does not alter the
meaning of 3 .
It is still a game try with hearts agreed. Some play this return
to opener's suit as constructive but non-forcing, allowing the partnership
to get back to the better fit when opener has raised hearts on three
cards, but mainstream style is for 3
to be forcing for one round, just like a bid in a new suit. As always,
if partner makes a game try in a suit, she wants us to look in particular
at our holdings in the bid suits. We will look at our decision
over the game try next month.
|