|
|
Search MSO Worldwide |
| MSO Events | Mind Sports Zine | Brain Power | Play Games Online | Community | Links |
|
|
Appeal No 8 |
||
|
Tempo
Open BAM Teams, 20 November, Board 15
The Facts: 4 The Director ruled that there had been
no unmistakable hesitation and allowed the table result to stand. The Appeal: E/W appealed the Director's ruling. The E/W team captain (George Jacobs) attended the hearing. E/W claimed that a hesitation of approximately 5-6 seconds occurred after the 1NT call and that South's double might have been suggested by the hesitation. North said there was no reason for him to hesitate holding only four points vulnerable, with his partner not showing any values. He thought he had taken 2-3 seconds to bid over 1NT. N/S explained that at a previous regional,
the Director had been called to the table because they had bid too quickly.The
Director had suggested they hesitate briefly before each bid. N/S pointed
out that this was a BAM event, and risking the double at BAM was a good
gamble with South's holding even if partner could not contribute to the
defense, especially since, although East had shown extra values, West
had rejected two game tries by East. The Committee's decision: The question of the hesitation was discussed fully, and the Committee found no reason to find that there had been a hesitation by North. Therefore no infraction had occurred and there was no restriction on any action that South chose. The Committee also decided that this appeal was without substantial merit, and should not have come to Committee. East, West and the team captain were issued an appeal without merit warning.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||